White Pride Stormfront Debate

2007-05-17T21:47:00.000-07:00

Pan Aryan Alliance allow debate of racialism/femininity concept

I saw a link to my concept appear there, then went to debate it.

http://www.panaryan.com/forum/showthread.php?t=1863

This is my first opportunity to present this concept to a racist forum in a year of trying. Previously it has been supressed almost everywhere. So i'll be taking my time to present the arguments properly. So far the concept has been supressed from Stormfront, majorityrights.com, fightdemback. The blog has also dropped completely out the google listings (not down the listings but deleted from them) on the very day i made a post stating the the jewish system fell under this theory. Google has anti-semitic rulings on blog content. This site is owned by google. It still has no appearance in google, despite being in the top four in msn search for almost six months under many major search terms such as "white pride"

This so far is the debate on Pan Aryan network. I presume they are allowing me to debate there because its splinter group where the racists are women. SO they would be interested to hear a concept such as this.
=============

[QUOTE Lieutenant]
"One, point I'd like to make, to you, which I have not done so over on the Phora. Perhaps just because I have no read into too much of it, but what you have to understand is, that where you come up with your terminology like female racism vs. male racism to describe the behavior differences you are going to be naturally greeting by confusion from the anti-racist types and indignation from the racists on the flip side. What your theory is, being a way of systematically describing a relationship if I understand it, implies a solution:"
[/QUOTE]

I need to redo that. The word racism for a start is too emotive. Women are'nt going to like being called racist by instinct. And Racists are'nt going to like to be called partly feminine. Ok i admit i was being a bit reactive to begin with, and enjoyed presenting the contraversy. That was due to the battle against supression. REally if the idea is strong, i can do without that kind of contraversy. Any better ideas for terms would be appreciated.

Just to re-iterate. I'm saying that the majority of men are tribal, and tribes are "overall" more amenable to conversion of others through domination, influence, persuasion. (this conversion process interestingly seems to be similiar to the way in which male gene sequences themselves operate in genomes) So this isnt racist. It doesnt eliminate foreign genes but allows them in, if they submit. Tribal instincts are manipulated often by the minority of racist men, but its not racist.

When i say females are racist, its not in the way that men are. It's not agressive, it doesnt set out to eliminate. It just selects a lot of similiar sets of qualities. You could only describe female elimination in terms of reproductive rejection, and that would be abstract. We could get into all the stuff about what females do in groups and networks, but to simplify..they converge and clone desirable examples and variants of success in the present context. Because their group is convergent, it's more likely this context is dictated by the previous. Females still allow in a small amount of foreign genes, if they offer significant improvements.

[QUOTE]
What your theory is, being a way of systematically describing a relationship if I understand it, implies a solution: Your solution. For my benefit and the benefit of others here, you should probably start by describing or "proving" why exactly is the racialism expressed today, not beneficial...or beneficial for that matter. For example, if you are going to argue in one case that Europe was founded on "masculine competition" and that this was a good thing, as it produced the European race as we know it today, and then simultaneously argue that globalization ensures a more race mixed future whether we like it or not, and then again argue that we should not practice eugenics, even while admitting the differences between the races, well, let's just say, I think your moral view on the subject contradicts itself.
[/QUOTE]

Its just the application of complexity theory to human groups. The relationships in these groups tend to occur between the feminine components, but less so the male ones. SO male racists will make strong rules about what genes should be eliminated, and there wont be any exceptions, because they dont have the capacity or ability to connect to anything else. If anything male racists need to control the breeding instincts of their own women, because their own women will look for some outside genetic material if its better than their own men.

So in a way the male racist is fighting for control over the natural instincts of his women. If there is a solution, its exactly what you say, and i was surprised someone understood what i said enough to produce a better description.

"Female racism, moderates male racism,."

I never thought about that. Perhaps the women here could comment. So thats saying the reverse of what i just said about racist men seeking control of their women

"Female racism, moderates male racism, or rather is merely a more sophisticated extension of it, which has adapted to the modern situation

I would disagree with that extention, unless we had some view that females from africa were more right brain dominant..and so produced less convergent patterns of social behaviour than we have up north now where women are more mixed to left brain dominant. The limbic system instincts which produce female selective behavior come from lower species. Regardless of cortical brain dominance and the expression of complex cortical thinking, they still select. This is still on ongoing area for me. I'm studying a female i'm dating. Behaviour is right brain dominant, yet when i plot her hormone fluctuations on a chart in accordance with her cycle She still resorts to expressing very convergent feminine instincts. (shes into this stuff also so is quite into me doing this) My take on this dichotmy is that this is because limbic and cortical development occur at different stages.

Ok back to the point..the contradictions. These i should say are just the result of skipping into one area..getting a bit reactive..sometimes but jumping out..and not going back to rewrite and..say "Look i got a bit reactive there"..I will redraft the whole site and it will probably bear little resemblence in tone to its present form, and just discuss racial instincts in terms of biological systems and complexity. The stuff on southern europeans, was just a debate against stormfronts takeover bid on southern europe. Its not really that important.

Really i'm not looking to solve Europes racial problems. My prime project is trying to rebuild system theory, because thats what i'm suited to. I don't have any belief or group affilliation, because all thats apparent to me is figuring the overall human system. This just happens when you get into complexity research. Anyway in answer..I think female instincts will sort things out in Europe. They are after all why we are here having this debate. What i mean is sure..we have this one big factor that even no educated anti-racist can deny..the inclusion of lower intelligence.

White women in less IQ laden but more strength orientated working class populations do go for other races where raw strength is more important to them than intelligence. A moderate IQ, with a more functional adaption pattern and high strength is better at dealing with the kind of problems they face. Ok i'm reffering to the most extreme cities here, but it does go on, and those cities are the fastest breeding ones. So the point is there is still some female selection occuring from the groups male racists want to be totally rejected.

Back to your question. When female networks become disconnected in extreme type r population memetics, and paternal control dictates selection, such as islam, or in africa where the women seem to behave chaotically (perhaps because they are right brain dominant) then women face difficulties exerting selective control. In both these populations rape was hardly a crime by law till very recently. Thats not a problem in europe.

.

2006-12-05T09:00:00.000-08:00

I Hadnt quite expected this blog to rise so rapidly in the search engines.

Typing white pride into msn search I’m at number four. (update number three now)

1. www.whitepride.com
2. www.stormfront.org
3. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/White_pride
4. stormfrontpride.blogspot.com

I need to do another page soon regarding my total dissapearance from google

http://www.mootsf.org/forums/showpost.php?p=107483&postcount=3

Lots of sites get deleted from google..but this isnt just what happened. High ranked Forum discussions about my site also dropped off on the same day, I put up this post, which mentions jews.
Seeing as these are not linked..we basically have a human
hand at play in the jewish run google. I've done a lot of research on google, i'll put it up soon.

To summarize, its true, they have guys sit and delete political content they dont like, if they can get away with it, (so the major racist sites will get a bettter treatment than minor players like me.) Google are up to all kinds of stuff..not that its googles top guys. Google will be jewish infiltrated by now at employee level..

just as the media is manipulated at a lower level than boardrooms.

Anything which mentions jews is number one on their list for deletion

So I'm being supressed by both white nationalists and jews.

I guess i must have some good ideas.

(Update 26/12/2006) ..the day i mention here my analytical skills are going
to be re-directed from white nationalists to google..my listings re-appear under
google. My research into google finds that that supressed listings re-appear
as soon as anyone makes a fuss. indicating we have sub drone jews, messing
around with the listings, but do not want to be pointed at in case they lose
their jobs)

Anyway with this kind of internet profile, i'd better explain myself.

I’ve got some Arabic appearance from my father who is from sicily. (A well known spot for Arabic incursion.) The british rise in racism made me prone to a lot of muslim abuse, and I also have found that i teamed up with “Westernized” muslims a lot in sport, academic research and work. Strange considering, that I’m not in any way muslim. The reverse. I’m half Ashkenzai (European jew). I’m not however part of the jewish system and have been considered a self opted outsider by my jewish relatives for a long time. Almost decades. What was going on ?

One of my prime but still unrecognised life aims is the research of complex systems using inductive analysis by means of symmetry and asymmetry. I get academic support and written a book on how this applies to the brain which should be out mid 2007.

Trying to break apart brain structure lead me to research aspects of brain differences relating to sex, which primed me for my current project, which is to understand whether the electromagnetic system of our planet affects the distribution and evolution of differences in human groups. In some of these groups there is clearly defined race.

Where was the information on race ? Science at that time said it didn’t exist. (it does now with 10% of genes found to be non-similiar). It was to be found in the sites and writings of white nationalists. They had a clear grip on the best research in this area and were politically mining it for all they could. Publications from white nationalist websites tended to “join the dots” in regard to singling out jewish involvement in the ills of European history.

http://www.jewwatch.com/

The average person can tell that the site is interesting but of tabloid sensation towards inflammation. White nationalist writers also overfabricated white genes as the key to the success of western civilisation.

http://www.white-history.com/index.htm

The work is generally considered ridiculous with the author found to retouch the colour of images.

http://dienekes.angeltowns.net/articles/kemp/

However racist groups tend to be fragmented. With high and low quality researchers. Much of the high quality researchers tended to be morally outraged ex jews such as henry makow with inside insight as to what is going on.

http://www.savethemales.ca/index.html

Its well revealed now, the Jewish control of the media, and manipulation of major political systems was not a paranoid as it sounded. Jewish manipulation of American political system was behind the iraq incursions.

http://www.irmep.org/Policy_Briefs/3_27_2003_Clean_Break_or_Dirty_War.html

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Clean_Break

IN regards to the prime subject of race. The best researchers tended to be academically repressed.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J._Philippe_Rushton

http://psychology.uwo.ca/faculty/rushton_pubs.htm

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Richard_Lynn

SO I spent a lot of time on the major racist forum stormfront.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/

I was getting a whole insight (albeit skewed) into many aspects of living reality. Much of this was helping my non political project of unravelling the structure of human systems. I debated on the opposing views section. A lot of my threads gained a good readership.

in general I must have about 14,000 readers, due to various posts i have begun.

Just these two reached 2,500 very quickly. Used different names due to their heavy moderation.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=309604&highlight=italian+stallion

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=310090&highlight=stallion

4,500 readers for this one

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=264711&highlight=why+the+white+majority

SEX DIFFERENCES AND RACE

Due to the fact that I was researching sex differences in human systems as an aspect of electromagnetism, it became clear to me that an interest in racial preservation which tended towards an average mix was a very feminine domain.

A Womans whole life rests on making correct genetic judgements, that need to converge in her mid 20’s. The woman cannot afford to make too many jumps in genetic difference. Just a degree of development away from her previous genome will do. So this is why odour preference research found that women were able to detect mens odours to genetic level, and the preferences were to be an increment away from their father.

“A 2002 study found women prefer the scent of men with genes somewhat similar to their own over the scent of nearly genetically identical or totally dissimilar men.”

http://www.livescience.com/humanbiology/060213_attraction_rules.html

Female selection develops the genome. (XX chromosomes prevail everywhere, with Y being minor) Eugenics is then a female domain. Women make mating decisions through their networks, unless they are completely dominated within a type r pool, which is higher in testosterone. Muslim, African or any working class segment of a western population.

http://pespmc1.vub.ac.be/RKSELECT.html

http://www.lrainc.com/swtaboo/stalkers/jpr_rghrs.html

Men do not naturally care about genetics. As masculinity increases, the desire to have sex with anything and leave increases. All the y-chromosone does in the whole genome is protect the basis for, skeletal muscle structure, sperm and testosterone production, along with right brain dominance in post natal development. (divergent behaviour). These Y-genes are also copied and structurally re-enforced so they are unique to the entire genome using powerful pallindromic sequences. That focus mutation to protect this handful of genes.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Y_chromosome

Why ? I’m not going to get into this for now, just to say that my current opinion is that mans purpose genetically is to explode and throw divergent chaos into the genome. The primary domain of this expression becomes the environment. Women own the genome. Men explode and diverge the environment.

The male aspect stops stagnation, develops strength, immunity and creativity, where as Female eugenics is much like the steady development of popular cars) is an increment away from the previous model, focussing on stability, security, reliability and efficiency.

As I began to develop this idea, it tried to present it for discussion on stormfront. I would never appear. Having a bit of experience on the forum I knew their rules and so rewrote the threads to be more sanguine.

Still no appearance. I thought what I’ll do is discuss some aspects of the research but not on the theory behind it, then bring up the theory. As predicted the aspect threads appeared and as soon as I revealed I had a theory that men who adopted eugenics strategies were of the feminine type K population, those posts were repressed.

I tried rewriting everything several times into different formats leaving several months between posts. Still the subject was never allowed to appear. I knew I was onto something. Hence this blog. It consists initially of all the threads that were not allowed to appear, with new developments. SEEMS from the search engine results and forum discussions a lot of people are finding my ideas interesting.

OK that’s it for now.

Sprinkle

2006-10-23T04:45:00.001-07:00

FIGHT DEM BACK is a jewish organization.

I put my blog round for review around a few anti-racist forums. I was stunned at the venomous response from FIGHTDEMBACK

http://stormfrontpride.blogspot.com/2006/09/current-forum-discussions-regarding.html

The FIGHTDEMBACK reaction

How bitchy is that..this did not seem like a normal reaction to my views. IT stood out from all the others significantly. Look at how i give properly referenced replies and look at the venom. What was the problem ?

I considered this for a couple of weeks and it dawned on me that the reactions felt jewish. I am half ashkenazi/half italian. Although i am well out of the jewish system, my chidhood has given me a feeling for jewish reactions.

A search soon revealed what i thought. FIGHTDEMBACK is jewish funded and run.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fight_Dem_Back

Apparently the guy who runs it is gay jewish guy Asher goldman. In fact i sent my theory to the head of FIGHTDEMBACK by mail. So i presume it was Asher who is "Carl sexheimer on the forum". His behaviour and blog indicates he is of the hyperagressive homosexual type.

They were intellectually dishonest. The reason they didnt like my blog was that it had sub truths which apply to them. ALthough stromfront is my focus, I use jewish groups as an example of other racial groups which become femininized. In fact my statements regarding jews are more benign. I consider them as a whole at one with their squewed sexuality, as are orientals. FIGHTDEMBACK are not in that category.

Nowhere on that dicussion was this aspect brought up. A couple of replies were intelligent and i gave them good replies back.

FIGHTDEMBACK ? Their agenda remains hidden unless you dig around a bit and use street savvy to figure it out. Jews arent portrayed well in Australia.

To conclude and by co-incidence i had a very powerfull dream last night. I was crossing a newly built bridge in my home city, and overheard some women discussing this blog as being very interesting. Kind of a fame thing i guess. I just walked by them across the bridge. As i crossed the bridge i recognised some older jewish bearded men standing in front of a huge ad billboard. I belive this represents jeish media. I began to lose my rag, perhaps spurred by my confidence that the general public were finding my blog interesting. SO I shouted at the JEwish man with the most smug wry smile.

"theres nothing to being jewish, it an incoherent sham !!"

The bearded man shouted back with glee.

"look at how we survive"

I have been at odds with my jewish background for decades now. I shouted a lot back which was pretty good stuff. Pity it is now hard to recall.

I think that dream helped my realization today that FIGHT DEM BACK were jewish.

2006-10-02T19:45:00.000-07:00

FUTURE PLANS AND CURRENT JUDGEMENT

Well this blog is a side issue, which is also helping me to test blogging and internet market for my real serious projects.

Blog now appears on google...results here

http://www.mootsf.org/forums/showpost.php?p=107483&postcount=3

THINGS THAT HAVE TO BE CLEAR.

This fledgling blog had done the rounds, and taken flack as well as many finding the ideas interesting. Heres what has to be clear right away.

1. Femininity is not a bad thing. I never thought it was. How can half of what makes life be bad. When feminine behaviours are adopted by men, whether culturally or become embodied in their brain development through time, and taken too far. Now that’s another matter entirely. My take on racial groups is that the post natal developmental stage in which testosterone produces right brain dominance is missed out. Racists, the eugenic, cultural preserve (exploitive racism)......

http://stormfrontpride.blogspot.com/2006/09/i-propose-two-distinct-types-of-racism.html

type are clusters of men who may have one or two female brain components. There are about half a dozen known major brain structures due to sex differences. SO just possesing one or two of the minor ones from the opposite sex, wouldnt make a racist gay, just that they would be veering towards exhibiting some female social behaviours, infused with a normal physiology. In fact racists are homophobic, but this is also considered to be linked to insecurity about oneself.

Homosexuals Sometimes Display Violent Homophobia

abridged from http://brainmind.com/Homosexuality1.html

As I have noted elsewhere (Joseph, 1992b), in some instances of “homophobic” violence, the attacker is in fact beating upon his own unknown face. Homosexuals are often beat up and attacked by other homosexuals–including those males who do not know, but who fear that they, themselves may be “queer.” These latter males may in fact go out in search of a “queer” to beat up, and may force the “queer” to perform fellatio…….A great deal of “gay” violence, is in fact perpetrated by homosexuals, including those who know they are homosexual, and who are in homosexual relationships……… actual physical violence against homosexuals is predominantly committed by homosexuals. ………In a recent PBS series on those who murder homosexuals, it was also inadvertently revealed that almost every single individual convicted of visciously murdering a homosexual had previously had sex with men. And in some cases, groups of men who have had sex together went out as a group in search of homosexuals they could rob, beat and murder. …….However, it should also be stressed that violence, in the form of sadomasochism is also characteristic of the homosexual “life style;” the frequency, intensity, and nature of which varies widely among individual homosexuals with a minority of such individuals deriving intense sexual pleasure from mild to moderate pain including torture. ……The propensity to indulge in, and the fascination with violence and sadomasochism–in a significant MINORITY of homosexuals (about 30%), is probably also due to the significant structural changes and hypertrophy within the limbic system. That is, as the limbic system mediates sexuality and violence, in cases of an abnormal limbic system, sexuality and violence become linked. Thus some homosexual (and heterosexual) men becomes exceedingly sexually aroused by violence and sexual violence in particular. ……This may well explain why throughout history, the most visciously sadistic of men and male-dominated organizations, have consisted of homosexuals. Consider, for example, Hitler’s notorious S.A. The leadership of the S.A., the “brown shirts,” was 100% homosexual. The members and leadership of this association in fact established the first concentration camps in Germany, where they delighted in torturing and murdering all political enemies. ……Likewise, consider, the two teenagers who killed 13 fellow students at Columbine Senior High School in Littleton, Colorado, on Monday, April 19, 1999, were both homosexuals who delighted in emulating the Nazi salute and yelling “Heil Hitler” in the halls of their school. ……Likewise, the war against women conducted by the Catholic Church during the Middle Ages, was orchestrated and carried out by homosexual priests. ……..Bishop Bossuet, of France, advocated that over 180,000 women be gathered up in one body and that “all be burned at once in one fire;” and hundreds of thousands if not millions of women were murdered……..Even as early as 1404, well before the sexual mass murder of women reached the height of its madness, the Papal fathers had burned at least 30,000 women. So many women were murdered that it could be said that the Church was attempting no less than a whole sale genocide of women–”sexocide” at Lederer (1973) put it………Often all the women in a given area were rounded up by the Catholic authorities. Those who were exceedingly attractive were then hideously sexually tortured and then slaughtered by burning, boiling in oil, crushing, and via whatever device the religious authorities felt appropriate or which suited their sick minds. In Germany huge ovens were constructed for the purposes of mass female murder (Achterberg, 1991; Lederer 1968)…….Indeed, the term “faggot” which is now used to described homosexuals in general, was originally employed to described those priestly homosexuals whose profession was to burn these women at the stake; i.e. foggot=kindling. Fagots supplied the wood for burning the women. …..Of course, it was not just women who were hideously tortured and sadistically murdered by the homosexual clergy, but Muslims, Jews, and fellow Christians. …..It is important to stress, however, that only a significant MINORITY of homosexuals appear to derive pleasure from sadomasochism and violent sadistic behavior, i.e. about 30%

WHAT IS THE RACISTS NEUROLOGICAL CORRELATE ?

I predict it is mainly left brain dominance an indicator of low T in childhood. (but not as adults) I have invited stromfront members to do an online test to prove this. Of course they refused.

PErhaps also another explanation for the neurological correlates of racism is odour sensitive pathways, which according to the work of Philipe J Rushton is the criteria which women subconsciously select out who they mate with.

I did this diagram synthesised from uni texts and what we currently know to put together a complete image of sex differences in brain development.

Blue are the female wirings. Red the male. As you can see the females brain olfactory tract is strong. SO sensitive it reacts with fear to genetic differences.

http://img218.imageshack.us/my.php?image=striaoq9.jpg

2. The point I’m making about racialism is not that the femininity component is a startling realization. Ok perhaps it is to go into it in this detail. The point is that obsession with eugenics leads to the suppression of mans natural creative instinct to do as he pleases (just try saying and doing what you feel like as a member of a white pride group).

3. The premise here is built from scientific reading. My presentation is hurried. Blog structure is not to good for now. (first blog)

Other issues

Thanks to this forum.

http://collaborativeproject.org/forum/index.php?topic=20.msg51#msg51

My theory list needs fully referenced blogs for each point. However i assure you the theory points were created from references held on my drive. When i get a break from day job i will do this while dealing with the many excellent critics. Just getting this site up and running took creative effort. Now rewriting, referencing is a major job. I am hoping my ideas will still be strong after taking all comers. The reception has been better than i anticipated. A lot of quality people found the concept interesting.

Hopefully this blog will become something i feel other blogs should link to. But not yet. For now this is the best way to progress. Online development.

2006-10-01T20:05:00.000-07:00

Google success for search terms

this is happening faster than i thought.

My initial aim was to get to page one for the terms "white pride stormfront" these are the terms i am thinking people looking for stormfront will type. In fact google appear to be allowing only two pages of results for simpler terms such as "white stormfront" or "nationalist stormfront"

I thought i would have to write a well researched papers, spend ages debating and getting things done right, and spend till next year researching internet marketing.

Refer to this for current results on google and MSN

http://www.mootsf.org/forums/showpost.php?p=104348&postcount=30

This theory is in a fledgling stage, but i feel the basic premise is sound.

Just the two forum discussion linked to that got 1200 readers in a few days and top star ratings on one. For stormfront in general I must have about 14,000 readers, due to a dozen posts i have begun.

Just these two reached 2,500 very quickly. Used different names due to their heavy moderation.

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=309604&highlight=italian+stallion

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=310090&highlight=stallion

4,500 readers for this one

http://www.stormfront.org/forum/showthread.php?t=264711&highlight=why+the+white+majority

Those are respectable readerships numbers. And the speed with which they aquired readers was fast. About a week did it. Many threads in Stormfront are at numbers of 16,000 and above, This because they get re-bumped for many months. I tend to leave when i get the discussion i needed.

Other progress found in searching the terms racism femininity

http://www.fightdemback.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=30223#30223

2006-09-24T20:11:00.000-07:00

Current Forum discussions regarding the content of this blog.

Good threads on mootstormfront

http://www.mootsf.org/forums/showthread.php?t=5303

http://www.mootsf.org/forums/showthread.php?t=4895

http://www.mootsf.org/forums/showthread.php?t=5126

A good level of debate

http://www.thephora.net/forum/showthread.php?t=13571

A more in depth one

http://www.mootsf.org/forums/showthread.php?p=98138#post98138

A rather bad reaction

http://www.fightdemback.org/forum/viewtopic.php?p=30223#30223

A better reaction

http://collaborativeproject.org/forum/index.php?topic=20.msg51#msg51

2006-09-24T19:46:00.000-07:00

2006-09-21T04:37:00.000-07:00

POINTS THAT WHITE NATIONALISTS ARE AFRAID TO DISCUSS

FIRST OF ALL READ UPDATE

http://stormfrontpride.blogspot.com/2006/10/future-plans-and-current-judgement.html

The link between racialism and feminity.............

http://stormfrontpride.blogspot.com/2006/09/stormfront-suppresses-debate-linking.html

Majorityrights.com supresses the debate also.....

http://stormfrontpride.blogspot.com/2006/09/majorityrights.html

Europe was founded on masculine competition..........

http://stormfrontpride.blogspot.com/2006/09/europe-was-founded-on-masculine.html

Male Racism is reactive. Feminine racism is based on genetic lineage.

http://stormfrontpride.blogspot.com/2006/09/i-propose-two-distinct-types-of-racism.html

Our planet (earth) picks the dominant race.....

http://stormfrontpride.blogspot.com/2006/09/our-planet-picks-dominant-race.html

Immigration increases human abilites......

http://stormfrontpride.blogspot.com/2006/09/immigration-increases-human-abilites.html

2006-09-20T21:59:00.000-07:00

Europe was founded on masculine competition..........

I've already pointed out that some White nationalist writers fabricate and rewrite european history in a manner that most now be very embarrasing.

http://stormfrontpride.blogspot.com/2006/09/immigration-increases-human-abilites.html

White nationalists select greeks and italians as fine for their pagan white gene pool. When in fact it is obvious southern europeans are quite genetically mixed, and were even darker skinned in europe pre-history.

Global Halotype tree

http://www.mcdonald.cam.ac.uk/genetics/images/y_distribution_map.gif

If anything the roman and greek creative tenacity that founded Europe, is in part genetically derived from the hot-blooded behaviour of our middle eastern brethren, combined with a hike in IQ. The greater IQ in southern Europe, Greece and italy may In part also due to epigentic adaptions to diets high in omega 3. That is the land mass in these continents is thin so diets are higher in fish. Other similar thin land mass nations, with good fishing waters : Japan, Nordics and Britain also have experienced similar explosions in intelligence.

All of this can be seen by the y-chromosone haplotype tree. Northern whites and southern europeans had long been on seperate travels genetically at the time when the southern european romans and greeks were developing cilvilisation like crazy. There is a sound argument that the heavy presence of omega 3 in olive oil and roman, greek fish diets facilited the faster mutation of intelligence within greeks and romans. The same genes which mutate to utilize omega 3 for quicker cell membrane re-uptake (IQ related) have been found to have higher degrees of linkage disequilibrium (those genes associated with omega 3 uptake have been found with their counterparts for disease mutations associated with that..link to Ashkenazi IQ) within the high IQ european jewish lines. Not how those jewish diets are higher in fish also.

White nationalism then has a cognitive dissonance between two arguments. The vague part that says they rose to be superior continent because of our genes, and the other one. That southern European genes with higher levels of testosterone derived from the middle east, increased creative drive.

What really happened after the founding of the philosophical, scientific, architectural, artistic, medical, political systems set up by southern Europe, was consolidated in the middle ages, due to the fall of the roman empire. Pagans capitalized, adapted and absorbed a lazy and exhausted PRE_EXISTING european continent that had already been founded on a southern european adaption of middle eastern genes.

How do white nationalists, which originate mainly from northern europe fix the dissonance between this racial purity and genetic inconsistancy with historical reality ? They say the greeks and italians from the ages BC are white, when in fact they were not. They may have a great deal of whites from the middle ages on, when white genes piled in. In reality the genes which founded europe were agressive, tenacious and intelligent all together. When pagans flooded our developmental centres the creative genius we had was diluted from the south to the north.

Basically it is misinformation that following the white racial lines to the nordics leads the best stock. The nordic line is "relatively" more feminine than the greek, roman line. Follow the genetic lines back to the darker southern europeans and you will find the racial basis for a strong blend of male abstract ability and cognitive superiority. This is because high levels of testosterone within a gene pool increase the brains creative abstract ability, and this usually has a downside which can be seen in many africans. Men become lazier and lower in metal energy. However infuse High T lines with IQ mutations which result in mental energy an order of magnitude greater than normal, (such as fish diets which mutate IQ) and suddenly you have male dominated populations with a high creative abstract ability that overides the usual male hormonal drives to lazier basic instincts which come from the limbic system. This is because the development of IQ involves the outer brain cortex more than the hormonally driven inner brain. The outer cortex is an order of magnitude larger than the inner brain.

From my life experience (my father a Sicilian) and the opinion of my italian relatives who actully resided in southern italy, greeks and italians who are darker consider ourselves to be of the original superior genetic stock and even to this day do not want their daughters to marry with "white mongrels".

When genetic decisions are made on erronous and strict rules such as genetic lineage, it creates a population which allows individuals to breed not based on merit such as the gladiator system. This defies mans natural instinct for free competition.

GENETIC RULES

Male genetic lines focus mutation and drive evolution based purely on the y-chromosones limited but uniquely strong genetic mechanism to presever sperm production and testosterone. Apart from skeletal structure there are few genetically transmitted male traits. However testosterone abstracts the pre-existing female gene sets explosively. Male systems operate by men testing each others merit and ability. There is some reverence to racial rules, but at the end of the day the deciding factor is that men have always allowed men of other races to enter competion and prove themselves worthy, if those men convert themselves. Life will not always be easy for those men, but they are given a chance, rather than be cut off by an unshakable genetic rule.

That is close to the blanket way women think. The oft quoted kinship research of Rushton was based on "Female" odour preference, rather than who men pressure their daughters to marry ?

Also interesting is that white nationalists respect the racism of the chinese race. What happens with orientals is that they breed, testosterone (but leave just enought to reproduce) and abstract processing out of brain structure. This develop female lines which recombine on a chop and change rather than conversion basis. Like jews which are also highly racist and develop along maternal descended lines there is similiar correllations. Brain energy mutates at the expense of raw abstract ability. Note how the greatest deal of mortality in chinese and jewish population are brain and nervous related disorders.

Stroke in China, 1986 through 1990.

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/entrez/query.fcgi?cmd=Retrieve&db=PubMed&list_uids=7482636&dopt=Abstract

Jewish disorders of the nervous system

http://www.economist.com/science/displaystory.cfm?story_id=4032638

Just to re-iterate the point in case its not clear. Male genetic lines facilitate conversion of other able males, while female genetic lines chop and change on a purely rule based system. Also known as female logic.

Whites evolved by being a blend of male and female extremes. Plenty of evidence exists. We all know this already..

SO there is absolutely no point in veering of to the female selection methods unless white nationalists want to feminise themselves and in doing so lose their creative abilities.

Rules like. Everybody who is white European, No exceptions are female constructs. People behave like their genetic structures. Racist groups based on eugenics will create female characteristics. These are logic based and tend to create non creative but stable gene pools full of the same errors.

I always wondered why racist thinking was so bitchy.

(images from \http://www.lore-and-saga.co.uk/html/romans.htm,
http://www.vacationstogo.com/cruiseports/viewport.cfm?port=63)

2006-09-17T18:56:00.000-07:00

Majorityrights.com supressed the debate also.....

Majority rights.com is a white nationalist blog which attracts some hight quality thinkers. I thought I would take my research on racialism and femininity there. My posts are under the name “Italian Stallion”.

http://majorityrights.com/index.php/weblog/comments/early_evidence_that_immigration_may_be_a_major_cause_of_autism/

My research was as well received there as stormfront. However just at the point I was gagged, I got quite an intelligent response by “Rnl”. I’ll post my reply to that here.

By Rnl…

“In other words, in a peaceful society in which women are free to choose mates according to their own inclinations, most will choose men on the basis of some physical resemblance to their fathers. Their choices will therefore be racialist in effect, though not always in intent. For example, they’ll be more likely to choose other Whites as mates and less likely to choose Blacks. On the other hand, in a society in which these natural mates have been removed (killed, perhaps) women will be compelled to accept mates who don’t resemble their fathers. The latter situation is, in your opinion, preferable to the former. Women will no longer have the reproductive upper hand, and that’s good.”

This point is neither good nor bad to me. These are the realities of human systems. I’m only interested in researching that racialism based on appearance and genetic lineage is a feminine trait. Even if it’s men that are promoting it.

Rnl wrote

“Is that a fair summary of your argument? If it is, you must explain how the bad effects of what you regard as the non-optimal mating pattern come about. Why is it bad if women choose their mates according to their own inclinations? By what mechanism are the allegedly bad effects of their ability to choose transmitted to their racial group? Why should I be worried that women, if they are allowed to act on their own inclinations, will choose mates who in some way resemble their fathers?
A program of mass interracial rape would, it’s worth observing, produce the state of sexual politics that the Stallion considers optimal: “When their natural mates are removed through conflict the female is more likely to be dominated and are losing the reproductive hand to the male” (Stallion). “

An example of how white nationalists love to dramatise and twist sanguine research. As a researcher of systems it would be clearly counterproductive, if I had a problem with female behaviour.

Rnl wrote..

Quoting me “If you pursue racialism based on observable genetic qualities the result is an increasing convergence towards a group which exhibits female dominance. “
Again, you have to specify how this occurs. You appear merely to be saying (a) that women are more likely than men to choose mates on the basis of observable genetic qualities and (b) because racialism values observable genetic qualities, just as women do, racialism is feminine, which is bad. If that’s what you’re saying, it can’t be taken seriously. You are invoking “feminine” as though it were stigmatized as a negative cultural trait and then attaching it to racial attitudes that you want Whites to reject, relying on the mistaken assumption that male racialists will repudiate any “feminine” set of political beliefs as a threat to their masculinity. I don’t see how you could mean anything more substantive, because you have provided no explanation that I can discern for how (bad) feminine traits are physically spread throughout a racial group to bring about (bad) feminine effects.”

I’ll address how this feminization occurs clearly at a later stage. Again the point is being twisted. Femininity isn’t bad. I’ll requote some sections of my posts on that thread.

“The male biological system (when it has the upper hand) will tend to dilute, override and diverge from it’s genetic inheritability factor, in spite of all modifications we try to impose by religion, groupthink, racialism, ethnocentrism or whatever. When testosterone is high during child development, it increases right brain dominance. Illness aside, this remains all ones life. Right brain dominance is creative, restless and divergent. As a result its non racial as a human system high in testosterone will spread outwards. Right brain dominance is higher as the testosterone level within the population increases. Put simply Type r populations are right brain dominant. Type K left brain dominant. This is the focus of my research in the area of human systems. Type K population are biased towards femininity. As the K factor increases the femininity increases. Rebound strength decreases. Male fertility decreases, Creativity decreases.”

Following from that I wrote

“the formation of white nationalism has nothing to do with how the white european gene pool succeeded and that the preservation of that, by natural laws of physics is not only impossible but counterproductive. CReative progress cannot be preserved. Preservation destroys male creativity, which occurs by the existence of freedom, conflict, dynamism, promotion of the masculine and mess basically.”

This is the crux of my debate. Not about femininity but that white nationalism prizes it’s creativity over jews and orientals. The most racial groups on the planet. Racialism based on genetic lineage and appearance suppresses masculinity, eventually killing male creativity.

Rnl finished by writing

“At any rate, none of this theorizing of yours has much contact with the real world. In the real world White racialists oppose Third World immigration. We do so for a variety of reasons. Some prefer cultural arguments, others prefer genetic arguments. But the most obvious and by far the most popular argument (really just a fact) is that Third World immigration causes bad effects to Whites as a group. We’re worse off as a result of it. In Europe Muslims blow up trains and demand the imposition of medieval sharia law. In the United States non-Whites are massively overrepresented in crime statistics and both demand and receive racial preferences that penalize Whites. Because the importation of non-Whites causes and exacerbates these (and many other) bad effects, White racialists oppose the importation of non-Whites.
Let’s implausibly stipulate that our opposition to non-White immigration is feminine. Your task, as an advocate of multiracialism, is to prove why we’re wrong, not how we’re feminine.”

White nationalism pre-exists these problems. The rhetoric, the blame finding get replaced over the centuries with whatever ills the world. The racialism is the only thing which stays the same. Not that the issues brought up by white nationalists are real. Just that they are also superficial. They can be dealt with by conventional governments. Racialism leads to race.

Finally more nonsensical accusations from white nationalists. Now I’m an advocate of multiculturism. Well I’m not so I don’t need to answer the challenge posed.

I’ll repeat my point. Racialism leads to femininity which results in the curbing of male creativity. This creativity began and progressed Europe to the prize that they say they can protect.

It’s of no doubt white nationalists are a concerned lot. However the whole idea about preserving their creativity is wrong. I’ll repost more quotes from the post I put on that thread.

Genetic interests are what femininity is about. Note how the Y chromosome is devoid of all genes except for unique focussed mutation mechanisms which preserve male fertility. The male genetic system consists of nothing but an abstract expansion which explodes within the pre-existing female one

“the formation of white nationalism has nothing to do with how the white european gene pool succeeded and that the preservation of that, by natural laws of physics is not only impossible but counterproductive. CReative progress cannot be preserved. Preservation destroys male creativity, which occurs by the existence of freedom, conflict, dynamism, promotion of the masculine and mess basically.”

2006-09-14T05:50:00.002-07:00

Stormfront suppresses the debate linking racism and feminity.............

I post on a lot of aspects about racialism on stormfronts opposing views.

Those which discuss the link between racialism and femininity are the most heavily censored. I have been unable to start a thread on the subject for 6 months now.

This is not to say i'm regularly prevented from posting many issues on stormfront. Many people are, including their own members.

This are the basic reasons mods supress posts.

1. I have just been downright rude
2. I'm just repeating old arguments.
3. The tone is trollish
4. I have posts that need expert answers, and the experts are on leave/
5. I brought up groundbreaking points they can't handle.

How to figure which of the above applies in any given post ? I developed methods to test what replies are prevented from appearing and why.

The issue on racialism and femininity has been prevented from appearing since february, and its purely down to the subject being too hot for stormfront too handle. I have tested this by hiding the points on it in more everyday threads and then using that thread to discuss the point. The replies are soon prevented from coming up. It's not the tone, its not rude, its not old hat.

Here is the content of the thread they will not allow to appear. It's just a list of points.

THE LINK BETWEEN RACIALISM AND FEMININITY.

1. Racism is highest in feminine genetic lines. Jewish and oriental. Amazingly 3,000,000 of the 16,000,000 jews are oriental.

2. Racism is higher in gay and lesbian communites. Yes another amazing fact, considering they do not have a reproduction agenda are are themselves a rejected minority for genetic reasons.

3. The use of logic based rules for mating decisions is a female trait.

4. Lack of testosterone boosts the growth of the feminine left side of the brain which is the side that thinks according to such logical rules.

5. Studies of racist leaders such as hitler find the asthetic vanity for colour preference is related to homosexuality.

6. The research done by william J. Rushton on genetic mate preference regards female odour preference. When under pressure, men overide colour preference and seek as friends only the males who are able to deal with specific problems.

7. The origins of legal homosexuality have pagan roots. Legislation allowing homosexual relationships increases with white races, and is highest in Nordic regions and candada.

8. Sperm production comes from the male y-chromosone. Sperm counts are falling in white races, even when those races are within a mixed colour population.

9. Considering for example that zionism and the Klu klux klan are race political movements. Women have played a greater part in the background of these than of any other political movements in their similiar time period.

10. Feminine gene pools which are Type K pools gradually develop weaker immune systems, aquire more diseases of the nervous system (a leading killer of both orientals and jews), lack creativity and the ability to succeed in sports.

11. Genetic interests are what femininity is about. Note how the Y chromosome is devoid of all genes except for unique focussed mutation mechanisms which preserve male fertility. This leads to testosterone production. The male genetic system consists of nothing but an abstract expansion which explodes within the pre-existing female one

========

Thats it. I've tried regularly for six months to post that.

So why do Stormfront mods supress a debate about racialism and feminity. Other racial groups have accepted this already.

I am thinking the following.

The very idea of squewed human sexuality has been heavily suppressed throughout human history, and only very recently has been researched. The existence of groups like stormfront, the modern version of the klu klux klan predates this recent understanding in human behaviours. I see confronting femininity as similar to the problems creationists face when confronted with science. There would be too many problems for white nationalists which operates to recruit within a reasonably masculine gene pool. Of course now the cat is out the bag, these issues will have to be confronted eventually. Here is what I see the problems as being.

Primarily fear of losing a grip on its floating male members who are reactive.

http://stormfrontpride.blogspot.com/2006/09/i-propose-two-distinct-types-of-racism.html

A coping mechanism could be adapted eventually to deal with the concept of white racialism as an expression of femininity, but is would be very demanding. For example jew and orientals still manage to exist quite well, even though they have long been aware of their weaker masculinity. White nationalism has a problem. It doesnt want to become like this. However there is the problem. By opening awareness it would have to.

2006-09-12T13:00:00.002-07:00

I propose two distinct types of racism.

REACTIVE BEHAVIOURS : Male Agenda :

Reactive behaviours are dynamic and short lived either in response to incoming change such as migration or to justify outwards expansion. Reactive racism is male orientated and dynamic. It can resolve itself through conflict and dominance. Reactive behaviours aren't trying to preserve it's genes. It's best analogy is that it's like an immune system aggrivated to attack anything unfamiliar. It is inherently male and operates to resist external change.

AGENDA : (ENVIRONMENTAL ADAPTION)

COLONIZED OPRESSION : Escape home pressure with state backed invasion.
INCOMING MIGRATION PRESSURE : deal with aggression initially
SOCIAL IDEAOLOGY : Determine if threat group can integrate

This Group reactivity isn't inherently racial, but lends itself to manipulation by local racial groups.

===================

EXPLOITIVE RACISM : Feminine agenda :

Exploitive racism is the most stable right wing type and associated with long standing racist organizations. It points out clearly defined races, and seeks to preserve it’s genes. Agenda arise need to protect themselves through racial segregation. Exploitive groups manipulate their own reactive groups psychologically who are very often working class. This kind of racism, forms legal organizations, clique homogenous groups, express fear and form non governmental political structures, when racial flooding is high.

AGENDA : (RACIAL PRESERVATION )

SCAPEGOAT UNDER PRESSURE : determine if responsibility is due to migrants
ETHNO NATIONALISM : Re-enforces racial groups for economic domination
LABOUR SHORTAGES : Seek migrants for labour pool.

2006-09-12T10:13:00.000-07:00

Our planet picks the dominant race.....

We do need to acknowledge that racial color indicates different brain and biological make ups. Interestingly white nationalists are racist against orientals. Orientals have higher IQ for the same reasons the white spectrum are evolved over blacks. Lower testosterone levels.

The irony is that by breeding lower testosterone levels, the result is runaway evolution, which leads to over consumption and environmental pollution.

China, along with europe and america becomes a leading polluter of the environment

http://www.economist.com/business/displayStory.cfm?story_id=3104453

This pollution sits in the atmosphere and increases heat. The effect is a subsequent hike in human testosterone levels. Testosterone levels are always higher in the hotter planetary regions.

Melanin levels are corellated with mood alterations of the tyrosine / tryptophan neurotransmitter metabolites axis, i.e lighter colour = lower dopamine as a well know example. This also has an indirect effect on the androgen/ estrogen axis which also affects the expression of male / female brain structures and also within DNA the x or y dominant alleles. SO skin color can also indirectly define the speeding up of evolution, by decreasing male dominance.

Ironic. The planet self regulates human systems. Our color is related to our global position, on a globe where the north pole was until recently the coldest one.

The High T (testosterone) spectrum races at the south hemisphere dont tend to evolve quickly. They may even prefer to regress. The lower T spectrum races evolve at a runaway rate and then pollute the planet. The planet then overheats, and selection then favours, those who produce darker skin melanin profiles which also links with more dopamine and the production of higher Testosterone. HighT spectum races tend to be right brain dominant, socially dominant, idea driven while not being economically driven and so consumption and industrial pollution will be reduced.

My opinion is that this consumption decreases because as mans testosterone levels increase, he becomes less interested in maintaining what he has, is more restless, migratory and impulsive.

This is in essence a thermodynamic view of genetic change. Our planet itself re-regulates through heat, the biology and colour of the races, at the sexual hormonal level. Which directly or not selects out the races which are least irritating it.

IMAGE FROM http://www.fragilecologies.com/img/global-warming.jpg

2006-09-12T10:08:00.000-07:00

Immigration increases human abilites......

White nationalists are keen on racial superiority. However this does not stretch to accomodating at any level one of the prime mechanisms which increases human ability.

Human migration.

EPigenetics (the study of environment on genes) has progressed far enough to show that migration is what evolves IQ, and its IQ which is the key factor in human evolution ?

Richard Lynns research presented in IQ wealth of nations "for all its faults" still succeeded in showing a clear global pattern between migration and IQ.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/IQ_and_the_Wealth_of_Nations

In IQ terms, the oriental races are more highly evolved here. Also ashkenazi jews have the highests IQ's. They have migrated more than any group.

White supremists are very smart on group politics and fabricated propaganda.

http://www.white-history.com/

Here we see a greek scholar rip it apart.

http://dienekes.angeltowns.net/articles/kemp/

"March of the Titans A History of the White Race" states that migration destroys civilisation. My opinion is that any civilisation has it's time span and that this is subject to natural entropy (Inevitable and steady deterioration of a system or society). Migration is symptomn of entropy, not the cause.

Lynn tells us that the nations which had racial mixing due to migration pressure have high IQ's, and that is the prime predictor of economic success. According to Lynn, the biggest predicted growing nation is the orient, which has a long standing harsh inter-migration history.

While many human groups are initially hostile to migrants, they will cherry pick from the migrants and this helps evolution. White nationalists say they will refuse to cherry pick. Even the greatest achievers and talents must leave.

A contradiction exists here for white nationalists. They cite themselves as the prime in human achievement, and then refuse to accomodate a basis for that. It makes me think that for this kind of regressive extremism to occur they must feel overwhelmed. THis is already a researched subject

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thomas_Schelling

The full jewish youth treatment is very similiar to the no race mixing white nationalist child rearing. In response to being told not to mix with non jews, I asked awkward questions like what if they are succesfull in all the ways that i am being told to be.

I was told in very clear terms that it didnt matter what non jewish people had made of themselves. This unconditional rejection is an underlying aspect of racism whether jewish or white nationalist which can be hard to get to grips with. I believe it only be be understood in terms of feminine logic expressing itself in what i'll call "Generational probation". The rejection is not really true, but an expression of a submissive "playing hard to get game" that is quite feminine. This manifests itself as a superficial witholding of approval for anything outside ones in-group withheld for at least one generation. Especially non jewish women.

However Jews clearly take in non-jewish people to their gene pool.

http://www.simpletoremember.com/vitals/WillYourGrandchildrenBeJews.htm

Their own line on assimilating jewish women hasnt stood up to pressure either. The ashkenazi jews who are now the most succesfull jews would have been on probation at one time. This cream of current jews are in fact descended from genetically non-israeli women.

http://www.pubmedcentral.org/articlerender.fcgi?artid=1380291

http://www.sdss.jhu.edu/~ethan/jFAQ.html

"The conclusion was that either the early Jews had an abnormally high mtDNA diversity (doubtful) or Jews have acquired maternal lineages since their emergence as a distinct group (quite likely)."

It was migrating jewish men who impregnated non jewish women.

My point is that white racist behaviours are very similiar to jewish behaviours and represent female selection. Their statements about no race mixing cannot be taken seriously in any consistent manner, but represent an aspect of Schellings game theory. When their numbers are flooded by the unfamiliar, they will reject. When their numbers are in danger they will assimiliate.

White racists pride themselves on being an "average" of racial characteristics. This requires a lot of race mixing.

IMAGE from http://academics.utep.edu/Portals/532/Immigration%20Family%20007.jpg